Preview

Title

Advanced search

Evaluation of the influence of Stellest spectacle lenses on the dynamics of individual indicators of myopia progression in children of different age groups

https://doi.org/10.17021/2712-8164-2025-2-47-57

Abstract

The problem of myopia growth in children is currently a topical issue among ophthalmologists around the world, since complications caused by myopia can gradually lead to a persistent decrease in visual functions. The purpose. To assess the effect of Stellest spectacle lenses on the dynamics of individual indicators of myopia progression in children of different age groups. Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the clinical sites of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Astrakhan State Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the Turkmen State Medical University named after M. Garryev in the period from January to December 2024. The study group included 100 children (200 eyes) of the main group – 53 boys (53 %) and 47 girls (47 %), who were prescribed Stellest spectacle lenses and 45 children (90 eyes) of the control group – 25 girls (55.6 %) and 20 boys (44.4 %), who were prescribed monofocal glasses. All patients were aged 4 to 12 years with acquired moderate myopia without concomitant pathology of the visual organ. Patients of the main and control groups were divided into 3 groups depending on age. The examination list included such studies as manifest and cycloplegic refractometry,
visometry without correction and with full correction, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, determination of the anteriorposterior axis of the eye on an optical biometer (Topcon Aladdin), the nature of vision using a four-point color test, the volume of absolute accommodation, determination of the reserves of relative accommodation in children. The dynamics of the refraction of the anterior-posterior axis of the eye and the data on the reserves of relative accommodation in children of the main and control groups were assessed after 6 months and after a year in comparison with the indicators at the beginning of the observation. Results. Based on the obtained results of the study, we observe that after a year, most children who used Stellest transfocal glasses compared to children who used monofocal glasses have a more pronounced stabilization of refraction during the year, the data of the anterior-posterior axis of the eye changed within the permissible values, a natural tendency to increase the reserves of relative accommodation in both groups was noted, more pronounced in the group of wearing Stellest glasses, which indicates the positive properties of transfocal spectacle lenses on the dynamics of individual indicators of myopia progression in children of different age groups. It is noted that in the group of children aged 8 to 12 years of the main and control groups, the highest percentage of myopia growth is observed, which once again shows the relevance and significance of a more extensive study in the field of transfocal spectacle correction and other methods of monitoring the progression of myopia in children. Conclusion. Early initiation of wearing Stellest spectacle lenses is justified, well tolerated by children aged 4–6 years, allows monitoring the progression of myopia and minimizing potential risks of pathological changes in the eyeball associated with myopia. 

About the Authors

R. Z. Shamratov
Astrakhan State Medical University, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Rakhim Z. Shamratov, Assistant



L. Sh. Ramazanova
Astrakhan State Medical University, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Liya Sh. Ramazanova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor



Zh. K. Arustamyan
Center for Modern Technologies, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Zhanna K. Arustamyan, ophthalmologist



O. A. Napylova
Astrakhan State Medical University, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Olga A. Napylova, Assistant



K. S. Karanov
Turkmenistan State Medical University named after Myrat Garryev, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan
Туркменистан

Kurban S. Karanov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department



E. V. Kirevnina
Children's City Polyclinic No. 3, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Elena V. Kirevnina, ophthalmologist



E. P. Golyanova
Children's City Polyclinic No. 3, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Elena P. Golyanova, ophthalmologist



D. M. Agagyulova
Regional Children's Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Silishcheva, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Dinara M. Agagyulova, ophthalmologist



O. A. Panina
Children's City Polyclinic No. 10, Astrakhan, Russia
Россия

Oksana A. Panina, ophthalmologist



References

1. Holden B. A., Fricke T. R., Wilson D. A., Jong M., Naidoo K. S., Sankaridurg P., Wong T. Y., Naduvilath T. J., Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123 (5): 1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006.

2. Sankaridurg P., Tahhan N., Kandel H.IMI Impact of myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2021; 62: 2.

3. Wolffsohn J. S., Kollbaum P. S., Berntsen D. A. Clinical myopia control trials and instrumentation report. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2019; 60: M132–M160.

4. Ohno-Matsui K., Wu P. C., Yamashiro K., Vutipongsatorn K., Fang Y. Pathologic Myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2021; 62 (5): 5.

5. Bremond-Gignac D. Myopie de l’enfant [Myopia in children]. Medical Sciences (Paris). 2020 Aug–Sep; 36 (8–9): 763–768. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2020131 (In French.).

6. Ikuno Y. Overview of the complications of high myopia. Retina. 2017; 37: 2347–2353.

7. Ohno-Matsui K., Kawasaki R., Jonas J. B., Cheung C. M., Saw S. M., Verhoeven V. J., Klaver C. C., Moriyama M., Shinohara K., Kawasaki Y., Yamazaki M., Meuer S., Ishibashi T., Yasuda M., Yamashita H., Sugano A., Wang J. J., Mitchell P., Wong T. Y.; META-analysis for Pathologic Myopia (META-PM) Study Group. International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015 May; 159 (5): 877–883. e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.022. PMID: 25634530.

8. Jonas J. B., Jonas S. B., Jonas R. A., Holbach L., Dai Y., Sun X., Panda-Jonas S. Parapapillary atrophy: histological gamma zone and delta zone. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (10): e47237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047237. PMID: 23094040; PMCID: PMC3475708.

9. Zhang Q., Xu L., Wei W. B., Wang Y. X., Jonas J. B. Size and Shape of Bruch's Membrane Opening in Relationship to Axial Length, Gamma Zone, and Macular Bruch's Membrane Defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jun 3; 60 (7): 2591–2598. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27331. PMID: 31219533.

10. Tarutta E. P., Iomdina E. N., Kruzhkova G. V., Markosyan G. A. Remote results of scleroreconstructive treatment of progressive myopia. Rossiyskiy oftalmologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2011; 4 (1); 71–75 (In Russ.).

11. Tarutta E. P. Pathogenetically substantiated system of diagnostics, prognosis, prevention and scleroreconstructive treatment of pathological myopia. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftalmologiya = Russian pediatric ophthalmology. 2008; 1: 25–28 (In Russ.).

12. Barry N. Wasserman M. D., Tara Franz O. D., and Nidhi R. Review of Advances in Myopia Management. URL: https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/a-review-of-advances-in-myopia-management.

13. Zaraiskaya M. M., Bodrova S. G., Pozdeyeva N. A., Pashtaev N. P., Tikhonova O. I. The main methods for the optical correction of progressive myopia in the children. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftalmologiya = Russian pediatric ophthalmology. 2016; 11 (3): 144–148. doi: 10.18821/1993-1859-2016-11-3-144-148 (in Russ).

14. Lagasse J. P. Theory of changes in retinal peripheral defocus and progression of myopia. Journal of Optometry. 2011; 1: 48–57.

15. Saydasheva E. I., Dautova Z. A., Mitrofanova N. V., Lelya D. V. Modern approaches to the treatment of myopia in adolescents. Sovremennye Tehnologii v oftalmologii = Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2014; 4: 62 (In Russ.).

16. Tarutta E. P., Proskurina O. V., Tarasova N. A., Arutyunyan S. G., Milash S. V., Markosyan G. A. The nearest results of application spectacle lenses with integrated rings of highly aspheric Stellest™ microlenses for myopia control. Rossiyskiy oftalmologicheskiy jurnal = Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2022; 15 (4): 89 (In Russ.).

17. Tedja M. S., Wojciechowski R., Hysi P. G. Genome-wide association meta-analysis highlights light-induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nature Genetics. 2018; 50: 834–848.

18. Gwiazda J., Hyman L., Dong L. M., Everett D., Norton T., Kurtz D. Factors associated with high myopia after 7 years of follow-up in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) Cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2007; 14 (4): 230–237.

19. Pärssinen O., Kauppinen M. Risk factors for high myopia: a 22-year follow-up study from childhood toadulthood. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97 (5): 510–518.

20. French A. N., Morgan I. G., Mitchell P. Risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren: the Sydney adolescent vascular and eye study. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120: 2100–2108.

21. Xiang F., He M., Zeng Y.Increases in the prevalence of reduced visual acuity and myopia in Chinese children in Guangzhou over the past 20 years. Eye. 2013; 27: 1353–1358.

22. Ding B. Y., Shih Y. F., Lin L.K.Myopia among schoolchildren in East Asia and Singapore. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2017; 62: 677–697.

23. Matamoros E., Ingrand P., Pelen F. Prevalence of myopia in France: a cross-sectional analysis. Medicine. 2015; 94: e1976.


Review

For citations:


Shamratov R.Z., Ramazanova L.Sh., Arustamyan Zh.K., Napylova O.A., Karanov K.S., Kirevnina E.V., Golyanova E.P., Agagyulova D.M., Panina O.A. Evaluation of the influence of Stellest spectacle lenses on the dynamics of individual indicators of myopia progression in children of different age groups. Title. 2025;6(2):47-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17021/2712-8164-2025-2-47-57

Views: 189

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-8164 (Print)